- cross-posted to:
- stuffandsuch
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- stuffandsuch
- [email protected]
I once believed university was a shared intellectual pursuit. That faith has been obliterated
I once believed university was a shared intellectual pursuit. That faith has been obliterated
If students can cheat on writing papers, why don’t we stop using it as a learning metric? Why not use in-person, timed tests instead?
In person timed tests suffer from people under performing because of external circumstances. Also we should consider chatgpt as a tool that can be used like a calculator. If the answer to a test can be easily retrieved for a widely available tool, the test is only measuring performance that is no longer required. Where possible, ideally measuring performance is based on their skill during a larger time period regardless of the tools they might use. For example repeated in-person peer review sessions (without a specific time slot) could both improve once performance and generating evidence of performance over time while reducing effort from the staff