Citation 7+8 note that the officers who were convicted of corruption had admin privileges, including the ability to change message content.
Of course, it’s a PDF of a document that says it’s an official court document but is hosted by the site and not a .gov link. I didn’t track down any of the case file numbers to confirm it. If you want to, go nuts.
Right. That seems like more effort than it’s worth in comparison to how much I care about the situation. As you say, the guy was already a piece of shit. That’s why it’s easy for me to believe, especially considering the evidence. Anything that may point out the evidence is invalid is pretty buried or seems to only be spread among areas that have an interest in that narrative.
Citation 7+8 note that the officers who were convicted of corruption had admin privileges, including the ability to change message content.
Of course, it’s a PDF of a document that says it’s an official court document but is hosted by the site and not a .gov link. I didn’t track down any of the case file numbers to confirm it. If you want to, go nuts.
Right. That seems like more effort than it’s worth in comparison to how much I care about the situation. As you say, the guy was already a piece of shit. That’s why it’s easy for me to believe, especially considering the evidence. Anything that may point out the evidence is invalid is pretty buried or seems to only be spread among areas that have an interest in that narrative.
Anyway, thanks for the info and discussion.