• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 days ago

    Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.

    • Fermiverse
      link
      fedilink
      132 days ago

      Correct, but as bluetooth is possible over a certain range, “drive by attacks” might be possible.

    • The_Decryptor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      The “attack” is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.