• Maharashtra
    link
    -121 year ago

    Nowhere near gorillas.

    I am sure that the scientific model of evolution is vast and flexible enough, so that we don’t have to occupy the same place those creatures dwell in.

    • Yulia
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Where then? I mean, you seem to be more confident in yourself than most biologists, so you sure know more than them and can prove why humans belong to a different category?

      • Maharashtra
        link
        -71 year ago

        Where then?

        If you’re willing to grant me some considerable amount of money to perform relevant research and studies, I can provide a satisfactory answer.

        If you can’t, or aren’t willing to, then you need to continue to live knowing that at least one person in this world doesn’t exactly accept the model of reality you prefer.

        • Yulia
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          If you don’t have research backing you, why are you so confident? Just because you feel like it?

          • Maharashtra
            link
            -71 year ago

            Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions were backed by actual research, that was nevertheless wrong?

            Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions weren’t backed by in-depth research, who was still correct?

            • Yulia
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              While it happens, there’s absolutely zero guarantee you’re one of those who are correct without research

              • Maharashtra
                link
                -6
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Great things were achieved with zero guarantees.

                And great many deal of people achieved nothing wasting their fortunes on 100% guaranteed deals.

                • Yulia
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus? Convince me as if I am an investor

                  • Maharashtra
                    link
                    -41 year ago

                    I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus?

                    I don’t recall any theory being suggested here. Words do have their meanings and definitions - theory is no exception here.

                    Convince me as if I am an investor

                    You don’t struck me as trustworthy person. There are plenty of “wrongs” about your mindset. Too many to convince me that you’re talking real money.

                    Now, since all this discussion consists of you shooting blindly with flawed assumptions and me trying to get you out of binary B&W mindset, to no avail, and I grow bored of it - would that be all?