Nine prisoners have walked free after evidence presented by members of a forensics team turned out to be wrong — yet one man still awaits execution based on their testimony.
I read this a day or so ago. I feel the jury used the bite marks to modify the charge with the thoughts he committed another crime (sexual assault), but the neglegent homicide doesn’t feel off here with the other evidence. He wasn’t even charged with sa. A judge will step in in a civil case, neutering a judgement set by a jury, but won’t reduce being a bad caretaker down from death because the jury feels he committed another crime (influenced from what isn’t just junk science, but it almost sounds like the doctor could have fabricated the bite marks, that the original coroner never saw) that they didn’t even charge for.
I read this a day or so ago. I feel the jury used the bite marks to modify the charge with the thoughts he committed another crime (sexual assault), but the neglegent homicide doesn’t feel off here with the other evidence. He wasn’t even charged with sa. A judge will step in in a civil case, neutering a judgement set by a jury, but won’t reduce being a bad caretaker down from death because the jury feels he committed another crime (influenced from what isn’t just junk science, but it almost sounds like the doctor could have fabricated the bite marks, that the original coroner never saw) that they didn’t even charge for.