• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    Abortion should be legal at any trimester, for any reason. No one has the right to use your body without your consent (unless Republicans succeed). Pretty sure that’s how it is in Canada.

    • MasterOBee Master/King
      link
      -17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Abortion should be legal at any trimester, for any reason.

      I disagree, but once again, almost any western nation disagrees with you.

      No one has the right to use your body without your consent

      There’s a decent argument bringing a life into this world by choice is consent.

      Pretty sure that’s how it is in Canada.

      Canada is one of the very few nations to decriminalize abortions totally.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        Great, so Canada got it right, and you’re obviously swinging the weight of “western nations” as if it has any relevance. What matters is what can be argued to be correct, and I’ve argued that using bodily autonomy. You’ve argued… You’re right because most western nations agree. Totally barbaric and ignorant of my argument, but that’s obvious. You completely misunderstand consent, but that’s not surprising. I was taught that consent can be withdrawn, but you imply like she has to sit there and take it if she consented originally. Bizarre view of consent you have.

        • @tallwookie
          link
          -71 year ago

          surprising really, Canada could use more citizens/a higher tax base. really, very few people in Canada, all told

        • MasterOBee Master/King
          link
          -101 year ago

          Great, so Canada got it right

          No, they enacted a policy that you agree with. That doesn’t make it ‘right.’

          and you’re obviously swinging the weight of “western nations” as if it has any relevance.

          It does, we’re most comparable with other first world countries and specifically western countries. Pretty much in every comparable metric where we want to see how we’re doing, we compare it to first world european nations.

          What matters is what can be argued to be correct

          There is no ‘correct’ - just because you agree with it, doesn’t mean every single country needs to listen to you and enact policies you agree with. You have mad main character syndrome.

          Believe it or, people disagree with some of your opinions, and that doesn’t make them ‘wrong’

            • MasterOBee Master/King
              link
              -6
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              do you actually argue why abortion should be legal or illegal.

              Because that’s not my argument, that’s what you want to argue.

              I’m simply stating that almost every single other western country, even ones that are much more liberal than the U.S., has laws restricting abortions in the scenario that this woman had an abortion. If the U.S. is a shithole 3rd world country because of this, those nations surely are as well.

              Nebraska’s abortion policy at this time was more liberal than europes, who we offten compare our policies to.

              I’m also arguing that just because you think a policy would be good, doesn’t make it ‘right’ for the other 7 billion people in the world.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                You’re arguing that you don’t have to argue. You’re the same guy I’m replying to from yesterday about this very topic. I’m laughing so hard that here you are spending all your energy taking about what most western countries do or do not do, but you STILL won’t argue for or against bodily autonomy, for or against abortion. You have no argument! You just want to talk about things that are completely irrelevant, like what policy has been decided. It’s irrelevant! Argue or admit you can’t justify what you believe. This is my 3rd reply to you and you never argue or justify anything, just more invitation to meaningless conversation.

                • MasterOBee Master/King
                  link
                  -51 year ago

                  You’re arguing that you don’t have to argue.

                  My argument is that our abortion policies tend to be in line, or more liberal than many of the western countries the left looks up to.

                  I’d be fine with a 12 week ban, that’s in much of western europe.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    41 year ago

                    I don’t care! This is exactly what I meant about conservative misdirection when YOU were CRYING yesterday about how everyone ridicules conservatives on reddit/lemmy. Ridiculous ideas deserve ridicule, by definition. You refuse to engage my argument because you have no response. So you argue ANYTHING else, you ask me to consider your own arguments, knowing you’ll trap and misdirect at every turn. Abortion should be legal because we should have a right to our own bodies. Ultimately, you don’t believe in this right, which is why you avoid the topic. If you want to know why I treat you like other conservatives, it’s because you act like other conservatives.

      • @transmatrix
        link
        41 year ago

        Where is your evidence that “almost every western nation disagrees with you”? Because I’ve seen many polls that say otherwise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            None of these countries would permit an abortion at 28 weeks, let alone let her keep the babies remains.

            The article sheds no light on why she needed a late-term abortion. If something is permissible and publicly funded, chances are a person gets it done early, in a clinic, without hesitation. In case of wanting an abortion, delay is harmful, having to travel, smuggle something or fear something (or gather money) is harmful. Also note: those countries have a separate schedule for normal and exceptional conditions. Which is generally not possible in a political environment that has banned abortion (some cities in Nebraska - yes, in the US, cities can regulate abortion, very strange for me). Some examples that I know of:

            Estonia:

            • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
            • under exceptional conditions, 22 weeks (risk to health, severe foetal disease, raising the child is prevented by health or sanity, the pregnant is under 15 or over 45)

            Finland:

            • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
            • under exceptional conditions, 20…24 weeks (foetal abnormality gives a limit of 24 weeks)

            Latvia:

            • under normal conditions, 12 weeks
            • for medical reasons, 22 weeks
          • @transmatrix
            link
            -21 year ago

            You said disagree. Since when have laws been indicative of current public opinion?

            • MasterOBee Master/King
              link
              -21 year ago

              The country as a whole has laws that disagree with it.

              The U.S. doesn’t permit honor killings, as a country we’re against it.

              In Iran, it’s legal, the country agrees with it.

              It’s not that hard to understand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -171 year ago

      Some people do it even years after birth, so there are always someone pushing it.

      Point is that “tour right To swing your fist ends just where my nose begins”

      At some point those cells become person wether that is after three months, nine months or nine years is up to debate. I think medical professionals are best equipment to advice us.

      I don’t believe you will find many doctors willing to do abortion in 7th month.

      • Triasha-she/her
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        “(your) right To swing your fist ends just where my nose begins”

        Exactly, If you care so much transplant it into your uterus.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        You are arguing in favor of abortion when you say “your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins” I can’t believe you don’t see that. The principle says that we are generally free, but we don’t have the right to harm or infringe upon someone else. But, that’s exactly what’s happening when a woman is forced to give from her body to support a child. You are giving the child the right to swing their fist wherever, regardless of who it harms.

        The cells are a person from the very beginning. They are a person, and it is not wrong to abort them. It’s the most compassionate way to interpret our autonomy rights. The alternative is forced incubation.