• GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who cares? It’s a meme statement. It’s not using anyone’s likeness. Where is your proof that it’s AI and not graphic design?

        • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It has a distinct AI blurriness, details are off, and the text is clearly edited (the original text from the AI image was probrally useless and unreadable)

          Conclusion: I would say with 80% certainty that this image is AI generated

              • GladiusB
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not what the word evidence means. That’s a guess. Because I actually did a reverse image search and saw the original. So it leans closer to graphic art. But hey, keep telling yourself you know better. I’m pulling for you.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Weird place to question someone saying the meaning is more important than the medium

          • GladiusB
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m very surprised that anyone even responded to this comment. It was more to the OP that said “fuck AI” with zero evidence that it’s AI and doesn’t seem to understand how AI works.

            In fact I found the original. Which looks near identical. I’m more convinced this is graphic art than AI.