• HousePanther
    link
    fedilink
    English
    632 years ago

    This is certainly positive news. We need more competition in the processor field. Having essentially a choice between Intel and AMD got us malware like the Intel Management Engine and its AMD equivalent. With a monopoly comes enshitification.

    • eu
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Not that I disagree with you but what’s stopping any ARM or RISC-V CPU manufacturer from putting their own version of IME in their chips?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        ARM TrustZone is already common on A-series. Device manufacturers want secure storage & computation, so chipmakers provide it.

    • Jannis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      There’s ARM, with Snapdragon, Mediathek, Broadcom, Nvidia, Apple and Ampere. Contrary to RISC-V it’s already used in many computers.

      • @MigratingtoLemmy
        link
        English
        122 years ago

        All of which also have plenty of proprietary components and aren’t created with FOSS in mind.

        I hope that as RISC-V progresses, companies will pick it up and develop on top of it, giving users full access to their hardware alongside FOSS software

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sure, but they’re all using ARM IP; RISCV isn’t just one entrant into the processor IP market like ARM is, it allows any company to become an entrant with its own IP.

        Sure it’s not currently the ISA for man main processors, but it is already used by companies like NVIDIA and WD in their products.

    • @doppelgangmember
      link
      English
      82 years ago

      Duopolys might be worse. The illusion of choice and opponent security.