• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Exploit the global poor and extrajudicially unseat duly elected leaders around the world to subvert the democratic will of foreign citizens and maintain capitalist hegemony? Who did your daddy tell you the hungry witch was?

      • @RidcullyTheBrown
        link
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who did your daddy tell you the hungry witch was?

        You’re telling me it was the USSR. Poor thing, alone in the woods with nothing to eat… Those kids were so unfair to her

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          That was you, but your reading comprehension is not surprising. Maybe try some sources besides right wing propaganda. Good luck in life, you’ll need it.

              • @RidcullyTheBrown
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re obviously taking pleasure in debating an idea. Obviously so do I. However, you need more training. You have to add more support to your arguments and contradict the opposing arguments with facts that hold up. You have to concede points and counterpoint when possible. And most importantly, you have to bring datapoints to your claims.

                At the moment you’re only putting out ideas with very little data. When I asked for examples of sanctions and international pressure, I was expecting something like this which is concrete. The “Killing Hope” is a really bad data point because it doesn’t support your claim directly and it is “fictional” 3rd party data from a biased source.

                With the examples of actual sanctions, I would have pointed that USSR and their allies which included China and strong economic ties with India had its own access to resources and economic development and could impose sanctions of their own. In fact, I can point out that USSR controlled by itself a land area comparable to the entire NATO alliance today and that between them and China, they occupy considerably more landmass and have considerably more population.

                In fact, those sanctions were not going to make any dent in the actual USSR economy. That wasn’t the goal (since it was impossible to achieve). They were meant to weaken the relationship with the communist buffer states such as Romania, Poland, Hungary and they did to a certain extent.

                But, of course, USSR was doing the same thing in what has been the US back yard: South America. Countries like Argentina, Uruguay, Brasil were being aided by the USSR with loans, technology and technical leadership in order to remove them from the US influence sphere. And USSR was more successful than USA at doing this. In fact, Romania, Poland, Hungary only became US allies after the collapse of the USSR while the south american countries were closer to USSR since the 70s.

                The discussion from here either goes backwards in history to how Russia had a late start or goes into economic details for a while, but ultimately it always ends in the same place: one model collapsed, one didn’t.

                I grew up in eastern europe. I’m intimately acquainted with the philosophy, propaganda and history of the area. More than just 3rd party information. I’m also familiar with the Russian culture and arts. This was the only foreign culture allowed to be imported into my country for obvious reasons before the 90s.

                I’ve had similar discussions through my life and I’m frankly disappointed in this one. But keep practicing, you’ll get better at it. A hint: learn from the facts presented by others even if you don’t agree with the interpretation. It helps in the long run

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  learn from the facts presented by others

                  I would love the opportunity.

                  As it stands, all I’ve been presented are sanctimonious personal opinions about what does and does not constitute a global superpower, or a material economic advantage, or legitimate interference.

                  I’ve witnessed a concerted effort to deviate a statement about technological economic development to your own irrelevant and well-rehearsed goalposts, as well as the curious paradoxical assertion that the USSR was simultaneously fundamentally incompetent and masterfully capable of matching the first true industrial superpower in the height of its global influence.

                  You’re not debating an idea, you’re trying to steer the conversation toward a comfortable script, and frankly I’m not interested.