It’s lemmygrad, we’re the spectre. I’d bet at least half of the other instances out there block us, there’s only like 300 dedicated users on this instance, and they still can’t stop complaining about lemmygrad/tankies

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -71 year ago

    No, I’m saying China is a capitalist oligarchy. Currently, right now. I don’t believe it can ever become communism with the current people still in power. That can be debatable, but what they are right now is definitely not communism, and that’s all I was saying

    • commiespammer
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Yes, it’s not communism right now. But Xi Jinping is not a ‘capitalist oligarch’. And China has pulled millions out of poverty, build an advanced public transport system, given massive amounts of aid to third-world countries while helping them develop, and has cracked down on corruption. If this is a ‘capitalist oligarchy’ then I will gladly support it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, I would also call the US a capitalist oligarchy, wouldn’t call Biden an oligarch, and would say they’ve done the same in the past, so yeah I would still call it that personally. That’s generally how industrialisation under capitalism goes. I’d even go as far as to say the US and UK had a lot of influence on it getting where it is in the first place, and it’s very difficult to do trade with the west in this world without shifting towards capitalism. (Not impossible, but difficult)

        Edit: In the definition of oligarchy, a small group of people hold power. I take that as relatively small, so maybe I’m mis using the term. Aristocracy might be a better term, but it’s somewhere in the middle

        • commiespammer
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          The US has not eliminated poverty. Where did you get that from? In addition, the US has done nothing to help 3rd world countries at all, only to exploit them for resources. Before you say that’s what China is doing too, it’s not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            I did not say the US eliminated poverty and you didn’t say China has eliminated poverty?

            The US has indeed exploited countries for resources, but that does mean they haven’t also helped in some cases, even if it’s a minority of cases

            • commiespammer
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              China has eliminated poverty. And China helped in every case, while the US exploited in every case. I don’t see how those two are similar.

                • commiespammer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  51 year ago

                  How is that “splitting hairs”? If I go to your house and help you build it, is that really the same as blasting it down with explosives?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -31 year ago

                    No, I’m saying you took one small piece of what I said and latched on to it. Let’s say the US has never helped another country before for sake of argument. It doesn’t change the fact that I see both countries as capitalist aristocracies