• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Yeah, fatalities also go down. All hospitalizations do. It’s not survivor bias, it’s a solid inverse correlation between helmet use and injury. Netherlands, Denmark, Japan all have very low helmet use and very low injuries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      The three you just mentioned also have a heavy cyclist culture, and infrastructure in place that facilitates separate biking though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        That’s quite true. And they got that via sustained policy to encourage cycling. It’s been quite demonstrated that mandatory helmets actively discourage cycling, leading to both a disinvestment in infrastructure and drivers being less comfortable around cyclists (thus more dangerous)

        I am not making a point about individual choices. Anyone should feel free to wear a helmet. But public policy is a different beast, and the data on mandatory helmets laws are inconclusive as to benefit and clear as to cost.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Good lord, no.

          If having to wear basic safety equipment that literally dons and removes in a split second ‘discourages’ you from cycling, you are either incredibly vain or outright lying to yourself about the true causes of not riding.