The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what’s going on.

  • @DragonAce
    link
    327
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That man is repeatedly showing the world how stupid he actually is and how little he actually understands about running a company. He has never been in a situation like this where he wasn’t surrounded by a bunch of people playing babysitter and doing all the leg work to try to actually get his shit ideas to work. IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn’t even figured out what to call tweets and retweets, he really hadn’t thought any further than changing the logo and repeating the same lame idea he had 30 years ago.

    ABAM (All Billionaires Are Morons)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1241 year ago

      Or all billionaires are scum who have written the laws and ensured that the fine for this is no more than an annoyance and removing the sign without a permit was a worthwhile risk and the right call to make.

      • Bipta
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        This guy gets it.

        I think “all billionaires are scum” is perhaps too harsh, but it’s far closer to the truth than the views of society at large.

        • @samus12345
          link
          641 year ago

          You cannot become a billionaire without being a scummy person.

          • starlinguk
            link
            fedilink
            271 year ago

            Rowling became a billionaire by writing popular books and selling the movie rights. She’s a scummy person, obviously, but she didn’t become rich by being one.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah you definitely can become a billionaire without being a scummy person, just not trough business. You need to be an artist or athlete.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Definitely not going to be a CEO without being a piece of shit. You need that lack of ethics to make it that high.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You can literally start your own company and assign yourself CEO. It’s probably all of a filing fee away. It’s easy to become a C-suite.

              • @dot20
                link
                11 year ago

                You could inherit it

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 year ago

                  Which means you’re born into a weird sociopathic upbringing. Very fee born into wealth see any issues with it and even then, it tends to be short lived. One of the Johnson and Johnson heirs put out a documentary, but not much after that.

            • @samus12345
              link
              181 year ago

              As you say, she’s a scummy person, so you have no way of knowing that she only became a billionaire because of the books.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              21 year ago

              Most of the Harry Potter stories are stolen/copies of either existing young adult novels or existing mythology. There’s very little original material or concepts. All writers borrow from other writers, but Rowling is just barely better than a plagiarist.

          • 001100 010010
            link
            fedilink
            English
            281 year ago

            I’m pretty sure that future billionaire me seems like a cool guy, I’m totally not biased.

            Eat the rich, except if I become rich, then I’m exempt because I am a honorary proletariat

            /s but seriously tho, if anyone becomes a billionaire, they’ll soon get corrupted by the wealth

            • @NewDark
              link
              English
              331 year ago

              You don’t become a billionaire without exploiting so many people and then hording those riches to yourself. You’ve already been corrupted by that point.

            • Dr. Jenkem
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think for most people, they become an asshole on the way to becoming a billionaire. You don’t make that kind of money without exploitation and plundering. The only exception I could think of would be if they inherited the money. And even so, if you inherit that kind of money and don’t give out a good chunk of it, you’re still scum imo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn’t even figured out what to call tweets and retweets

      Obviously Tweet -> Xeet 💩

      • Dandroid
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Yeets and re-Yeets actually make sense for outgoing messages.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I think we need to read between the lines here.

      I honestly think he’s intentionally driving Twitter into the ground. Thing is he can’t just fire everyone and shut down the servers or he won’t get the tax write-off. He’s burying Twitter in a way that maintains tax status. So in a way that’s smart, but also stupid he spent what he did only out of spite.

      What he’s doing to Twitter is like a jumbo jet pilot that commits suicide by crashing the plane (that’s actually happened). Why do you need to take all those innocent people with you. Just go jump off a building, same end without killing a bunch of innocents.

      Really his destruction of the platform is about control, he has some kind of personal beef with Twitter so he used his power and money to kill the whole thing. He’s taking his bat and ball and going home.

    • godless
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      ABAM (All Billionaires Are Morons)

      Bill Gates is actually a very smart, and nowadays even pleasant, man.

      • @9point6
        link
        46
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He has not always been pleasant. Don’t fall for the post-retirement PR spin

        • exscape
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          “Nowadays even pleasant” clearly implies he wasn’t always pleasant though.

            • Em Adespoton
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              You say that, but look at the cadre of billionaires who no longer have anything to gain from being awful… but still are.

              Old habits die hard?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                That is a good point. I think most of them are just plain awful people who enjoy causing negatively influencing the world, while others are only awful when it benefits them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          He is the best billionaire. That may not be a high bar, but it’s something. If Elon Musk decided to retire and cure Malaria like Bill did (or maybe even just get back to space exploration or autonomous driving as he was doing before his Twitter craze, hopefully without fucking other people over?) I wouldn’t mind him as much

          • Em Adespoton
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Most of Bill’s philanthropy was due completely to Melinda.

            I’m watching with interest what new things he does now that he’s on his own.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I’ll take a horrible billionaire investing in malaria research over a manchild billionaire obsessed with naming everything X.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        You do realise it was Bill Gates who made the creators of the Oxford Astra Zeneca Vaccine make it paid and keep the methods of producing it hidden? Their original plan was to make the methods of production public, so that Governments could set up their own labs to produce more of it and save lives. There were many deaths that could have been prevented if it wasn’t for this terrible human being.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      This is actually hilarious. It didn’t occur to me that rebranding should also concern stuff like “tweets”, mostly because I’ve never used twitter, but I’m really looking forward to what he will come up with for those terms.