• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -51 year ago

    Even medium human writers can comprehend their work as a whole, though

    Sure, but a lot of humans are rather bad writers.

    but any company going full LLM isn’t looking for quality.

    That is true for 24h news cycle of online media, regardless LLM.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Sure, but a lot of humans are rather bad writers.

      Bad writing is still a step above rng junk, imo.

      but any company going full LLM isn’t looking for quality.

      That is true for 24h news cycle of online media, regardless LLM.

      Yes, that was my point. Setting up your company to put out more content than can possibly be processed by humans is a glaring sign of their values - ie quantity far above quality.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Bad writing is still a step above rng junk, imo.

        I’v read writing worse than GTP. I had to help someone write an essay - and I just wrote it for him in the end, because he absolutely lacked the skills to write a long meaningful text. At at the same time - genius of a percussionist.

        • Ech
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Do you think that person was signing up for jobs writing for blogs or content farms?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            Have you read some low quality journalism? The whole yellow press can be replaced with GTP and no one would ever see a difference.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              Ok, so do you wanna talk about your terrible writing partner in school? Or “yellow press”? Or maybe the topic of the article, which isn’t journalism in the slightest? Or how about my point, which was, again, that even bad writers have context, as opposed to an LLM which is just filling in the arbitrary patterns it’s programmed to delineate. Readability is not what I’m talking about.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                Dude, what’s with aggression? We just having a conversation that floats along. I’m talking about general LLMs capabilities to write text - which are in my opinion comparable to human writing, since again - a lot of people lack the same things LLMs generated texts are lacking. And I had some examples. No idea what made you so upset.

                • Ech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  You brought up several different, unrelated topics and pretty much ignored anything I said to disprove something I never claimed. That is frustrating to deal with.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -21 year ago

                    Except you are the one who responded to me. And if there is a point you made I overlooked - I will gladly answer it. I also didn’t disprove anything - just voiced my opinion. I’m not interested in a debate club and winning arguments, just sharing opinions and trying to understand others.