@raker to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agoOmnilingualismimagemessage-square45arrow-up1861arrow-down122
arrow-up1839arrow-down1imageOmnilingualism@raker to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square45
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish23•2 years agoI think templates is what he’s making fun of.
minus-square@ValmondlinkEnglish5•2 years agoHow so, templates make for less code usually? Or like template meta prog? I’m a C++ dev and I’m lost on this one :-p plz send help
minus-squarePhrodo_00linkfedilink4•2 years agoI think it’s because each template specialization works kind of like a new copy of a class.
minus-square@Valmondlink1•2 years agoStill not getting it, I mean you don’t even get to see the code? IDK
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years ago/shrug That’s my best guess, in the sense that that’s what the compiler ends up producing, for templated code: the same code copy-pasted for however many different use cases you have.
The C++ one doesn’t make sense
I think templates is what he’s making fun of.
How so, templates make for less code usually? Or like template meta prog?
I’m a C++ dev and I’m lost on this one :-p plz send help
I think it’s because each template specialization works kind of like a new copy of a class.
Still not getting it, I mean you don’t even get to see the code? IDK
/shrug
That’s my best guess, in the sense that that’s what the compiler ends up producing, for templated code: the same code copy-pasted for however many different use cases you have.