I could imagine that juror to be slightly biased toward the defendant once they had been saved by the defendant. No wonder the judge had to call a mistrial.
Afterwards the judge ruled a mistrial to avoid biases from any of the potential jurors who saw him save a life, and rescheduled his trial for a later date.
I’m not here to read articles. I’m here to read headlines and complain about imaginary scenarios I scared myself into trough just going with my first emotional response…and I’m all out of headlines.
I could imagine that juror to be slightly biased toward the defendant once they had been saved by the defendant. No wonder the judge had to call a mistrial.
Literally in the article.
You actually read the article on here? Respect!
Yeah, I couldn’t fit all of the relevant info in the title without making it incomprehensible
There is a text body for summaries and such.
There’s also the article, you lazy bones
I’m not here to read articles. I’m here to read headlines and complain about imaginary scenarios I scared myself into trough just going with my first emotional response…and I’m all out of headlines.
And I used it
All of the jurors should be assumed to be biased after that. A mistrial is the right thing to do.
Gotta keep em separated