The USA has literally more than one mass shooting1 per day. It has reached the point where these don’t even reach the news any longer unless there’s some special angle to make them “interesting”. The reaction to this, from an outsider perspective, should be “maybe we should do something about the proliferation of freely available guns”. The reaction to this, again from an outsider perspective, seems to be rather “OMG I BETTER BUY MORE GUNS!!!111oneoneoneeleventy!”

What gives? How come the USA has not yet figured out that doubling down on the strategy that led to the nation having a shocking murder rate for the developed world is not a working solution?

What is it about the USA and guns that makes you tolerate this state when you’ve got a culturally-similar nation to the north of you that, despite your cultural problems being imported, still doesn’t have your kill rate?


1 Defined as a shooting event in which at least 4 people other than the shooter are injured or killed.

    • @ttmrichterOP
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was implied I wanted to ask Americans who actually thought instead of bleating about their God-given right to shoot everything that moves while they fucked their firearms. Oh, and Americans who didn’t try unsuccessfully to actually make shit up on what my opinions of private firearms ownership, previous firearm experience, and current firearm ownership situation is. (ASK, dudes, don’t TELL. It’s not that hard, even for Americans!)