Just a small correction. Being not proven guilty doesn’t proves innocence. It just means that the accusation couldn’t be proven in court. That’s the price we pay for our justice system which tries to keep wrong convictions as small as possible, quite a few guilty people will walk free.
And I think in this case a guilty person walks free.
So when a certain number of accusations against a person is reached that makes the accusations true?
No, but much more likely.
You really think he gives a shit if you watch his movies? Cute but please keep in mind the dude is super fucking rich and his estimated worth is about 70.000.000$.
Just a small correction. Being not proven guilty doesn’t proves innocence. It just means that the accusation couldn’t be proven in court. That’s the price we pay for our justice system which tries to keep wrong convictions as small as possible, quite a few guilty people will walk free.
And I think in this case a guilty person walks free.
deleted by creator
where there’s smoke, there is fire my friend
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No. But with these many accusations I really don’t need that to make an educated guess.
And nothing prevents me from doing so since I can’t do shit about that fucker beside not watching his movies.
deleted by creator
No, but much more likely.
Yes? That’s my point!
deleted by creator