@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoUK Version of "Online Harms Bill" wants to prefilter content without due processeasydns.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]technology[email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkUK Version of "Online Harms Bill" wants to prefilter content without due processeasydns.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]technology[email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏linkfedilink4•1 year agoI wonder what the real need for this bill is, especially when it’s filthy easy to download a VPN app, and HTTPS exists?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoThey want to scan the content before you could send it. What I read, the proposed solution would work like a keylogger. The sent message is e2e encrypted, but you couldn’t trust the device you send it with.
I wonder what the real need for this bill is, especially when it’s filthy easy to download a VPN app, and HTTPS exists?
They want to scan the content before you could send it. What I read, the proposed solution would work like a keylogger. The sent message is e2e encrypted, but you couldn’t trust the device you send it with.