• IphtashuFitz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    We don’t need to validate that it exists because science has proven it over and over countless times.

    Have you ever validated for yourself that an element like lithium exists?

    Have you ever validated for yourself that nuclear fission exists?

    Have you ever validated for yourself that E=mc^2?

    Have you ever validated for yourself that antibiotics like penicillin actually do what they purport to do?

    • DaughterOfMarsM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nope, but I don’t go around pretending I have. You see, unlike you I am open to changing my opinion based on evidence.

      • MeaanBeaan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 years ago

        Pretty sure that’s exactly what “believe it when I see it” means.

        • DaughterOfMarsM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, it means “I am going to dismiss any and all evidence until such a time as it satisfies my definition of believable.”

            • DaughterOfMarsM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m glad we agree, because the problem is that it’s hypocritical. There is a double standard for the quality of evidence that you deem acceptable between this topic and most others. You believe many things despite never seeing physical evidence or based only on the testimony of others, because those topics fit into your current world view. You have subconsciously created a filter for yourself of your biases, and you now refuse to acknowledge them.

              • Platomus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                That’s not at all what’s happening.

                What’s the evidence of the aliens?

                • DaughterOfMarsM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Quite simply, it is the witness testimony under oath. That is evidence by any court’s definition.

                  • Platomus@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    That’s not evidence. That’s a claim. They are claiming they saw an alien, what’s the evidence of that?