Talking about you mr phil.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -82 years ago

    I understand why that wasn’t clear but let’s maybe slow your roll a bit here.

    Why? Did I hurt your feelings or something?

        • hoodatninja
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yet you’re picking a fight over whether or not someone has formal qualifications…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -22 years ago

            lol! That is ironic.

            Anyways lol, it’s wasn’t about the qualifications themselves, I just thought you were full of shit.

    • hoodatninja
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No…? You’re just being incredibly aggressive over what is clearly a misunderstanding.

      Given this response though I imagine we have plenty to disagree over, unfortunately.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -42 years ago

        Dude from my perspective you were lying about the details or misunderstood them, so that’s what I said. You consider THAT “incredibly aggressive”?

        As far as I’m concerned I don’t have to adjust my tone for your sake. I’m perfectly happy with the way I’ve chosen to express myself.

        • hoodatninja
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I was talking about Dr. Phil. I was correct about what I said. A misunderstanding made you come to the (passionate) defense of Jordan Peterson, someone I was not talking about but I understand why you thought so. The correct response is “ah my bad.” Not “well if you had said what I thought you did I’d be right.” Feel free to keep doing what you’re doing though I guess. I’m sorry you feel the need to keep coming after me despite my identifying the issue lol