Came out pretty good. Generated at 2048x1024 then upscaled 2x in img2img. No Refiner.

`cinematic photo breathtaking High Quality, Award Winning, photorealistic, realistic, photograph, landscape of a Overwrought Seductive The Nidhogg Dragon from inside of a Savanna, Hazy conditions, 50s Art, Alabaster lighting, film grain, Canon EF, Circular polarizer, Kodachrome, matte, subsurface scattering, radiosity, studio quality . award-winning, professional, highly detailed . 35mm photograph, film, bokeh, professional, 4k, highly detailed

(low quality:1.4), ugly, deformed, noisy, blurry, distorted, grainy, drawing, painting, crayon, sketch, graphite, impressionist, noisy, blurry, soft, deformed, ugly

Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM2 Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1207805303, Size: 2048x1024, Model hash: 31e35c80fc, Model: sd_xl_base_1.0, Variation seed: 3557558652, Variation seed strength: 1, Clip skip: 2, Token merging ratio: 0.1, NGMS: 0.4, Version: v1.5.0`

  • @[email protected]English
    2•1 year ago

    That’s still bullshit. Assuming it’s methane, the gas is 1.1kg/m3. Where air is 1.2kg/m3. You will need a really big volume of methane, like a Zeppelin or an hot air balloon.

    • ThelsimMEnglish
      3•1 year ago

      Those quotes were there for a reason :)
      Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but according to this, methane is 0.668 kg/m3?
      If I remember correctly, the author was hypothesizing that dragons would create hydrogen from water somehow. That would put it at 0.0899 kg/m3. Would that make it more feasible?

    • merde alorsEnglish
      3•1 year ago

      the audacity to call dragons being big balloons a bullshit idea 🤣

    • @[email protected]English
      1•1 year ago

      Let’s assume it is hydrogen 0.0899 kg/m3, then there could be more lifting (dragons electrolysis water inside). Ignition is via electric sparks (same system)