Steve Krakauer discusses how the media's coverage of the developments in UFOs investigations helped the public break its stigma around the possibility of ext...
Personally, I am noticing a change, albeit measured, in the coverage and seriousness given to this topic.
Did anything even come from this other than the same ambiguous nonsense every time they do this? Bunch of half answers, no evidence, and 3rd party sightings. Wake me up when the actual white house does an emergency broadcast on this.
Yes, a lot of the lose claims that have been floating around as rumor over the last 70 years have now been formally made under oath in a hearing. I see that as a potential step in the direction of disclosure of what the deep state knows about the phenomena, no matter what it might be.
Wake me up when the actual white house does an emergency broadcast on this.
Then I have to warn you that you might not enjoy this community. 🤷 I think there’s going to be a lot of posting and discussions with speculations about unproven claims, media analysis of the same claims and so on.
But I still think there’s a lot of interesting discussions to be had unrelated to weather any information is disclosed or not.
If you believe the phenomenon is real, is there anything people like us can do to help bringing out the truth and maybe even politically force the White House to acknowledge the phenomenon and force through public investigations?
If you believe the phenomenon is not real, is there anything people like you can do to help us all understand what is actually is?
This is a great way to work with people who are skeptical but more closed of than open minded. Really, these people are in the majority and we should regard this attitude as reasonable and normal.
I was in a discussion today and someone really confidently affirmed that Alcubierre were impossible because we don’t currently have the required technology. I pointed out that when von Neumann probes were initially thought of, AI and 3d printing were largely theoretical but here we are with these technologies ready to go. I chose those this because that is what I think the most reasonable origin is uap is.
Did anything even come from this other than the same ambiguous nonsense every time they do this? Bunch of half answers, no evidence, and 3rd party sightings. Wake me up when the actual white house does an emergency broadcast on this.
Yes, a lot of the lose claims that have been floating around as rumor over the last 70 years have now been formally made under oath in a hearing. I see that as a potential step in the direction of disclosure of what the deep state knows about the phenomena, no matter what it might be.
Then I have to warn you that you might not enjoy this community. 🤷 I think there’s going to be a lot of posting and discussions with speculations about unproven claims, media analysis of the same claims and so on.
But I still think there’s a lot of interesting discussions to be had unrelated to weather any information is disclosed or not.
If you believe the phenomenon is real, is there anything people like us can do to help bringing out the truth and maybe even politically force the White House to acknowledge the phenomenon and force through public investigations?
If you believe the phenomenon is not real, is there anything people like you can do to help us all understand what is actually is?
This is a great way to work with people who are skeptical but more closed of than open minded. Really, these people are in the majority and we should regard this attitude as reasonable and normal.
I was in a discussion today and someone really confidently affirmed that Alcubierre were impossible because we don’t currently have the required technology. I pointed out that when von Neumann probes were initially thought of, AI and 3d printing were largely theoretical but here we are with these technologies ready to go. I chose those this because that is what I think the most reasonable origin is uap is.