• @jeffw
    link
    English
    801 year ago

    I’m shocked! Who could’ve seen this coming?? /s

    But seriously, the world is fucking boiling right now and these people can’t agree to some standards?

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      651 year ago

      The old men who run the world don’t care because they’ll be dead soon anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Normal old people still care, because they care about the world and the people they love, whether or not they’re still around. Sociopathic corporate and political leaders, however, don’t care. The issue is not so much the age as the pathological selfishness that got them into those positions in the first place.

        • @markr
          link
          English
          161 year ago

          Plus they understand that they will be safe while the peasants go through the polycrisis’ genocide .

          • @krashmo
            link
            English
            141 year ago

            People who think they’ll be safe while everyone else suffers are just as deluded as those who think there is no climate crisis.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              101 year ago

              I read an article a while back about tech bros talking about surviving after “the big event” and they couldn’t figure out how to stop their security forces from rebelling and not kowtowing to some wimpy tech bro after society collapses. They came up with ideas like restricting food access and, I’m not joking, exploding collars. These people are idiots.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Yep, age doesn’t matter here. Just look at Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. They’re young-ish and have no problem with watching the world burn.

      • @designated_fridge
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        Pff, this has to do with people caring more about their polling numbers than the environment.

        Actually saving the environment requires some hard sacrifices and it’s hard to be the elected leader who tells their voters that they’re going to pay more and get less.

        But in non-democratic countries you’re right of course.

    • Evil_Shrubbery
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People that would lose a tiny margin of their profits would absolutely let the world burn instead, along with all biodiversity.

      So, water & food related mass migrations war, here we come!