Leo to [email protected] • 1 year agoLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down12cross-posted to: linux[email protected]
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comLeo to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: linux[email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoVery sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
minus-squarearouenelinkfedilink1•1 year ago@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
minus-squareNinelinkEnglish1•1 year agoYeah, I loved it and still use it on a few things. I’ve been using systemd-nspawn and find it to work a lot better than LXD
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
Yeah, I loved it and still use it on a few things. I’ve been using systemd-nspawn and find it to work a lot better than LXD