• @BigJim
    link
    21 year ago

    Damn I think I would take the monthly payments. I wouldn’t complain about ~$3m a month for 30 years. Whatever problems you have that money would resolve would probably be resolved in the first month.

    • @Serinus
      link
      41 year ago

      If you take the payments they put it in safe bonds to make a little interest and use that to pay you out over time.

      If you take the lump sum, you can choose where to invest. And you can hire someone to tell you where and how to invest it at a higher rate than they’d get.

      • @BigJim
        link
        21 year ago

        Either way they’re still keeping a large chunk of it. If it means I get more money over 30 years, I’d rather have that.

        • @nogooduser
          link
          11 year ago

          I think that it would depend upon your age and how long you expect to live.

          For example, if you have cancer or other terminal illness with a low chance of living more than 10 years then you’re better getting the lump sum. Same if you’re older than 80 or so.

    • scytale
      link
      21 year ago

      Yeah, it comes to a point when the prize is large enough that getting it in installments won’t make a difference vs getting a lump sum in terms of immediate need/gratification. $3M is an absurd amount for just 1 month.

      • @nogooduser
        link
        11 year ago

        I’m old enough that I’d probably not have to work again after receiving that first month’s payment. I definitely wouldn’t need to work after month 2 even with going on an annual holiday.

        Taking the monthly payment also has another advantage. You can financially fuck up and you’ll be able to start again next month. Provided you don’t start borrowing money based on your future income you’ll be fine.