• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    The Kremlin doesn’t seem to have the power to do anything about it… the other bridgehead has been there for what, two weeks?

    • BombOmOmOP
      link
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Russia has attacked the first bridgehead repeatedly for the last pair of weeks to no avail. They don’t seem to have the resources for dealing with these and bridgeheads are very difficult to maintain, which really means Russia should be able to. But as proven time and time again, they are not the force everyone thought they were. Still dangerous, but nothing even approaching a super power.

    • @Relo
      link
      31 year ago

      A literal bridgehead! There isn’t a way to destroy it shot of a Moab or tactical nuke.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yeah they’re dug in right under the actual structure. I wonder what the second bridgehead is doing for defense from artillery?