startrek.website is a partnership between /r/StarTrek and /r/DaystromInstitute from Reddit, they’ve both locked their subs over there for good. Follow @startrek for all your Trek needs. 🖖 :trek:

#StarTrek

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -751 year ago

    Great of the mods to unilaterally decide for tens of thousands of users to lock and make inaccessible years and years of conversation. I’m sorry your fefes are hurt, but this “we had to destroy the village to save it” is some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit.

    • KonQuesting
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’ve just discovered the main problem with centralized platforms like Reddit, Discord, Twitter. The only thing stopping the mods from making a complete archive of the old platform is the Big Tech owners of Reddit. These corporate interests own all your posts, memes, and DMs, forever.

      With federated platforms, the community leadership can easily backup, archive, or transfer everything whenever they like. That’s the power of ownership.

      • Lockely
        link
        fedilink
        211 year ago

        Not only that, but copies of everything now exist on every single instance that’s federated with startrek.website, so its potentially recoverable should something catastrophic happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -241 year ago

        And that’s fine. The mods, or whomever, have every right to go off and form another community, and the participants have every right to follow. The mods DON’T have the right to make the decision for me, restrict the content that I posted to a site they do not own, or otherwise interfere with my right to enjoy the archival content that they did not create. Hopefully the Reddit ownership will force the afflicted communities open sooner rather than later and let us each decide individually, rather than be subject to the whims of some babies that think an entity doesn’t have the right to manage it’s own tech.

        • Powderhorn
          link
          fedilink
          261 year ago

          The mods DON’T have the right to make the decision for me, restrict the content that I posted to a site they do not own, or otherwise interfere with my right to enjoy the archival content that they did not create.

          Source?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -151 year ago

            Just like, my opinion, man. But to be fair I should rephrase - in the context of moderation they clearly have the right to keep content to community standards, and that may involve those actions, but beyond that, they have no right to act as the “owners” of that content, which is self-evident, as one of the complaints is that Reddit owns the content.

            • Powderhorn
              link
              fedilink
              111 year ago

              That probably came across more snarky than intended. It actually felt softer than “Where’d ya read that?”

              Here’s the thing: Nowhere is it stated that you have the right to view content you posted in perpetuity, to say nothing about things posted by others. And mods have free reign to do whatever they want despite community wishes even if they rarely exercise that right.

              Essentially, this whole situation has exposed a lot of realities with regard to users’ rights on corporate platforms that you’re in fine company in being aghast at.

              Gmail could get the ax tomorrow. Will it? No … but it’s folly to expect it to continue forever because tomorrow’s covered. The internet was the starting point of “you’ll own nothing and love it” with your data. This is one of the results of the Faustian bargain.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                That’s cool, and I get your perspective. Here’s mine - I understand why some people are upset and no longer wish to support Reddit. The “right” thing to do, IMHO, would have been to start another community, explain why, and give people the option of migrating - pin it at the top or something. If you want to be more forceful, lock the sub so that no new info can be posted. As it is now, a small group of people unilaterally took action to “punish” Reddit and in doing so assumed control over my (the universal my - not my specifically, although I’m obviously included) content. That makes the mods no better than the corporation they’re trying to protest, they’re just using my content to different ends.

                Bottom line - each individual should have had the choice to boycott or not boycott.

                • Sam Thurston
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  @refugee @Powderhorn

                  Maybe I don’t understand the mechanics of what has happened. Can you not access your own posts from the locked subs?

                  In any case this is unfortunately a consequence of reddit delegating moderation to the community : clearly the mods did have the “right” or at very least the “authority” to do what they did.

                  • @jackiebrown
                    link
                    21 year ago

                    I don’t think you can but even if you could, they would lose context unless you were quoting the entire thread in all your responses.

        • Spaniard
          link
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No offense but they do have the right, just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean they don’t have the right. Just like reddit admins have the right to open all the closed subs if they want.

    • @Doog
      link
      291 year ago

      Ah yes, because moving to a platform free from profiteering owners, an objective improvement to the community, is clearly just because fefes were hurt…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      claims that others’ “fefes are hurt” and says this is “some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit”

      turns out their own “fefes are hurt” and they proceed to engage in “some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit”

      • @T156
        link
        41 year ago

        There is also a currently active archive.org project trying to capture all of Reddit, and I would be extremely surprised if they weren’t also capturing both /r/DaystromInstitute and /r/StarTrek, at the bare minimum.

    • @TheCookieButter
      link
      71 year ago

      I would rather see a permanent freeze instead of private. Yes it helps Reddit slightly more than private subs, but there is years of discussion that could be kept while still making it obsolete and limiting reddit’s income/users from it.

      • Lockely
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I prefer they stay private for now to direct users, and then once July 1 happens, they can re-open as restricted for a limited time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -271 year ago

      Sorry - the downvotes have made me realize that “we had to destroy the village to save it” isn’t third-grade bullshit, it’s kindergarten bullshit. But please, play on, those, like, 5 of you who decided that it was your call to dump years of posts into oblivion because the platform that supported your conversation for years decided they’d had enough of freeloading.

      • DarraignTheSane
        link
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How do you not understand that reddit is a symbiotic relationship between users / moderators - who generate and moderate ALL of the content for the site - and the reddit workers and admins who host it? Without one the other can’t exist. Reddit is 100% freeloading off of users’ content just as much as users & moderators are “freeloading” off of the ability to access the content through the API.

        Reddit ownership (and you) have apparently chosen to either forget that, or ignore it.