• @ImotaliM
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    You were allowed to say it. I’m allowed to remove it. Welcome to the world. Don’t like it? Leave.

    But also: nobody in the world actually likes the idea of absolutist free speech. The founding fathers certainly didn’t believe in such an idea.

    • El Barto
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Friend, I appreciate your mod efforts, and I support 100% what you’re doing here.

      Having said that, I think there is a misalignment in terms of free speech definitions.

      What I think you’re saying is that people are free to express themselves, and the government (in the U.S., Italy, Argentina, wherever) will not censor you for that. However, a consequence of that is that you can ban them. Fair enough.

      But people are not referring to the free speech in the country, region or whether. They’re specifically referring to the exercising of free speech in the community you are moderating. You’re saying that “there is free speech here,” then it follows that transphobic comments should be allowed (something I wouldn’t like because fuck transphobes.) But since you remove comments that don’t align with the community, then the community doesn’t have free speech - and that’s okay. I’m just referring to the contradiction: “you’re allowed to say what you want, but I will ban you if you say this or that” - welp, that just means that “this or that” is not allowed.

      I think that’s what the other commenters are saying. They’re not criticizing you for removing comments. They’re calling out that removing comments (as a consequence of speech) and claiming that there is free speech, well no, technically it isn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Well yeah, but they expect people talking nonsense to get pummeled in the court of public opinion