• @Nolegjoe
    link
    -71 year ago

    Whether you like it or not, the UK still requires oil and gas in its energy mix, and will continue to require it for another decade or so. The options are to ship it in from the middle east, US, or Russia. Or, we can source it ourselves from the North Sea. Getting it ourselves will actually have less CO2 emissions as we won’t be shipping it halfway across the planet.

    • Tenebris Nox
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Not if the country went on “war footing” about the climate catastrophe and took measures to ensure that budgets were redirected into eco-investments (eg. stop spending £3 billion a year on the maintenance of 50 trident missiles). Radical investments in things like tidal power, completely free public transport etc. Where there’s a will there’s a way.

      • yip-bonk
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        This. We’re now past “well we have to kill the planet, because economy”, etc. Renewables, electric cars. Go.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Whether you like it or not, the UK still requires oil and gas in its energy mix, and will continue to require it for another decade or so.

      Tbh who’s fault is that. There was plenty of warning and time for the UK to decarbonise. She chose not to.

    • ThatIdiotMonro
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Except, how long will it take for this expansio to come onstream, and how expensive in terms of CO2 emissions will the infrastructure manufacturing be?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That is assuming that by extracting it ourselves we are at least equally reducing how much is being extracted elsewhere…. Which obviously isn’t the case. This will take carbon that’s currently trapped under the ground and release it into the atmosphere.

      They are killing us for profit & votes