In short, we aren’t on track to an apocalyptic extinction, and the new head is concerned that rhetoric that we are is making people apathetic and paralyzes them from making beneficial actions.

He makes it clear too that this doesn’t mean things are perfectly fine. The world is becoming and will be more dangerous with respect to climate. We’re going to still have serious problems to deal with. The problems just aren’t insurmountable and extinction level.

  • @assassin_aragornOP
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    What worries me about that thinking is that historically children have been the big reason for people to care about the future and what they’ll leave behind.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yes, but you can also still care about doing that without having children. I hope that this doesn’t follow those trends.

      People can also love nature, animals, history, the arts, and lots of other things. They might want other people to still be able to enjoy the things that they love in the future. I would still care regardless of if I have kids or not, personally.

      • @assassin_aragornOP
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Of course, yeah. I’m just thinking of the average person.