Dog meat consumption, a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula, isn’t explicitly prohibited or legalized in South Korea

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I think that is the best way to avoid unnecessary animal deaths (honey is also on that list).

    It is something I often consider when shopping, but I don’t always try to minimize unnecessary animal deaths. Just as I generally try to avoid big box stores and products made in certain countries, but sometimes buy those things anyway.

    Why do I make exceptions? Because I don’t believe that every single thing I do needs to be aimed at improving the world. It is simply an aspiration.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Maybe you would more of a impact on others if you decide to stop support the killing. I do shitpost sometimes, it be like that. But I also try to inform others. The point is not that you will change the world alone, but maybe convince others. If avoiding unnecessary deaths is your aspiration you can be a example to others.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What makes you think I’m shitposting?

        I am perfectly serious when I say that I believe veganism is incompatible with the stated goal of reducing animal deaths.

        And I am serious when I say that I have increased my intake of wild fish to support that goal, even though it is not my only goal.

        To me, the unspoken goal of veganism is to protect appealing animals at the expense of unappealing animals. That is why they show pictures of farmed cows, but not flooded rice fields. I can’t ever get behind that goal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          If there is some event that puts us all back to pre industrial times it will work.

          A plant based diet would feed with the amount we grow 10 billion right now. How many would a forage and hunting society sustain? To give you a idea of the proportions: https://xkcd.com/1338/

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure why you linked me to a chart of mammals. Hunting mammals may be a good way to feed a small population, but as you point out it’s not feasible for the entire world.

            Three fourths of all animal biomass is aquatic (fish, crustaceans, and mollusks), together accounting for 30-40 times more biomass than humans. Mollusks are the smallest component, but they still have more biomass than all the mammals in your link put together. Fish by themselves account for seven times as much biomass as all animal livestock put together. And crustaceans have even more combined biomass than fish.

            I’m not even suggesting that people eat only fish. Rather, by including some fish in our diet we would reduce our reliance on farm-grown vegetables.

            Globally, humans currently eat an average of 20 kg of fish/crustaceans/molluscs per year. That might be a bit too much, but I have no doubt that we could sustainably eat 10-15 kg per year.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              reduce our reliance on farm-grown vegetables

              this is the kind of stuff that screams shitpost :) you do you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Only if you assume that farm grown vegetables are more moral than any other food.

                It’s repeated so often that nobody even questions it. People assume you’re joking if you don’t take it for granted.

                But if you think about it, the assumption does not hold up. Farms are not benign, no matter what they produce.