• @aidan
    link
    -11 year ago

    Life is not naturally easy- it is only because of the labor of others that life is anywhere near as comfortable as it is now.

    • @TheDoctorDonna
      link
      101 year ago

      We have the means to make a fair and equitable society with minimal crime and no hunger. We, as a society, choose not to. We choose the hard life for the sake of getting everything we worked for to ourselves at the risk of losing it all with one bad day. That’s not comfortable. The labour of all should benefit all so that everyone can have an easy and comfortable life.

      • Wojciech Plackowski
        link
        01 year ago

        What do you mean by “we chaosem the hard life”? What do you think should be done to achive easy life for everyone?

        • @TheDoctorDonna
          link
          11 year ago

          We choose to continue to live in a pro-capitalist society, therefore we choose the hard life. Pure and true socialism is the easy way out my friend. Comfort for all.

            • @TheDoctorDonna
              link
              11 year ago

              More taxes ( mostly corporate) and not have the government misappropriate the funds, and giving a shit about other humans is a great start.

    • @orrk
      link
      61 year ago

      life can be easy for everyone if we all chip in a little, it’s the whole basis of society, we just can’t afford the hoarding aristocracy

      • @SCB
        link
        31 year ago

        Serious question: do you think the “aristocracy” has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault?

        Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn’t make it any less real.

          • @SCB
            link
            11 year ago

            It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al “hoard wealth” which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It’s impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it.

              • @SCB
                link
                11 year ago

                That’s not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it’s worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding.

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    … what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon’s stock value if Bezos cashed out?

                    And how exactly is owning a company “hoarding”