Less than a week after naming his new cabinet vowing a renewed focus on the concerns of Canadians, the one name Prime Minister Justin Trudeau couldn’t keep out of his mouth on Monday was Pierre Poilievre. At a housing announcement Trudeau brought the Conservative leader up multiple times, from panning his policy proposals, to his leadership style.

  • @Oderus
    link
    161 year ago

    Bitcoin Milhouse voted against helping all Canadians, again, just to spite Justin Trudeau.

    The prime minister criticized Poilievre for opposing the new federal dental care program. Trudeau said that program has allowed hundreds of thousands of families to send their children to the dentist for the first time.

    “He chose to vote against, and to stand against and try to block … in the House, the delivering of dental care for vulnerable Canadians,” Trudeau said. “Why would you do that?”

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-trudeau-anger-fear-cuts-1.6923410

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also:

      “That’s not Canada. That’s not how we build a stronger future. That’s not how we’ve gotten through the challenging times we’ve had in the past.”

      I agree.

      Now do something about housing, inflation, and the CRTC please.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Inflation isn’t something that anyone really gets to “do anything” about. The most successful applied economic model to explain inflation boils down to “when people start talking en masse about expecting inflation, companies take that as license to raise prices.” Every other economic model fails to reliably explain, predict, or resolve inflation, including the most popular - changes in interest rates.

      • @Oderus
        link
        11 year ago

        Now do something about housing, inflation, and the CRTC please.

        Such as? Inflation is already down to 2.8% which is in the range the BoC follows.

        • girlfreddy
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          @Tavarin @Mongostein

          The feds can legally purchase apartment blocks in any city and operate them as low income housing.

          They can do something about it … the feds just don’t want to become landlords because it’s complicated.

          Real leadership would recognize that leaving it up to provincial/municipal money-hungry airheads is just passing the buck.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            They have virtually no way to control supply, they don’t control zoning, don’t control infrastructure. Even if they buy up some apartments, which they would need to convince people to sell, it would be a tiny drop in the housing problem bucket.

            If we want housing solved we need to do it at the provincial and municipal levels, and stop electing conservatives in at those levels.

            • girlfreddy
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              @Tavarin

              Winnipeg, like Montreal, etc, has a ton of older apartment blocks (or 3 story walk-ups in Montreal) that need no rezoning or increased infrastructure. Purchasing a few of those in strategic areas would help to bring down rents.

              There are a ton of options available, and since municipal/provincial gov’ts aren’t doing anything the feds need to step up to the plate.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                And people already live there, the government would have to ask them to sell. There aren’t a bunch of empty unowned blocks for the federal government to buy, and they can’t force the legal owners to sell.