• MHPengwingz
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    So how much of this Havertz thing is just smoke?

    • @Mijn_Bergkamp
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Starting to think there’s something there but I doubt it will be quick. We don’t really need him and Chelsea are going to try and hold ou for another buyer/more money so could see this one going to the wire.

      Which as he’s not going to be starting isn’t necessarily a bad thing, either way you think we’re going for Rice/Caicedo first as they will be starting.

      • MHPengwingz
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean having him won’t be a bad thing, but for that price I’m surprised we are actually in for him. If we do get him, I’m curious how Mikel is going to cook him.

        • @Mijn_Bergkamp
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          The interesting thing about the quotes I’ve seen is ‘£60m “all in”’. Which suggests this is press fuckery to add more to the valu than they normally would when reporting a transfer (basically th opposite of how Haaland was done)

          So assuming you remove bonuses for winning and who knows what else it could be considerably lower.

          I’d take him at Jesus costs as he’s not on his last year of contract.

          • andantenz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I remember being gutted that Chelsea had landed him, thought he was a real baller from Leverkusen. If we can get a “fire-sale” type deal, then I think he can be good for us.

            • @Mijn_Bergkamp
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              To be fair, he did win them a Champions Legue final.

              Hopefully he can for us too.