Former President Donald Trump was indicted for an unprecedented third time on August 1, adding another set of serious federal charges to the mounting legal issues he faces.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    161 year ago

    It means he’s going to be tried for his crimes.

    • Raddnaar
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      It means he will be tried to see if he committed any crimes.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        281 year ago

        We aren’t the media here. We don’t have to play the “innocent until proven guilty or else he’ll sue us” game. The man clearly committed the crimes. He did it on national television. You can watch him tell people to “fight like hell” and tell them to march to the Capitol. It is an indisputable fact that he then did nothing to stop the insurrection until hours later.

        Why the hell do you need a judge to rule to determine that he’s a criminal? The judge is there to tell us what, if any, punishment he’ll get.

        This is just like people claiming he isn’t a rapist because the ruling in the Carroll case didn’t explicitly call it rape, when any reasonable person with a basic understanding of what rape is would understand that it’s rape even if that doesn’t fit the strict legal definition.

        Trump is a criminal. He hoarded documents. He showed classified information to people who were not qualified to see it. He raped at least one woman. He fomented an insurrection. He tried to rig an election.

        And you want a guilty verdict before admitting all of that? SMH.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          I think he is guilty as sin as well, however we still have to prove it on a court of law and hope the judge is not lenient and throws the book at him.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            31 year ago

            In this case, it’s a D.C. court with a judge appointed by Obama, so I don’t think lenience is going to happen.

            • cheesepotatoes
              link
              91 year ago

              We definitely do. We can’t eschew due process. It’s integral to our society.

              Everyone, everyone deserves the opportunity to defend themselves.

              That being said, he’s guilty as shit and I hope they throw the book at him. He wanted to steal the election and then invoke the military under the insurrection act to start putting down the resulting riots with gunfire. The man was going to kill Americans to keep his grip on power. It’s all outlined in the indictment documents.

              • @Stanwich
                link
                41 year ago

                Once again, “everyone” just means those who can afford it. Don’t think for a second is fairness for all. You would not be judged the same.