• @andrr_464
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    politicians are meant to be judged devs are meant to be criticized just for improvement, you can just use another app

    • King
      link
      English
      -81 year ago

      Sure? I only criticized ill stick to liftoff since theres only subscription option

      • @andrr_464
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        he has literally said he will add an one time payment

        • King
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          current comments defend his current actions so no opinion on that until it happens.

          PS: weird how the no ads option takes more time to develop than the subscription option with 10x features, INCLUDING the no ads one !

          • @andrr_464
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            it is still in beta, you can’t charge someone 30 euros for something that might fail or stop

            • King
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              30$? That’s only 6x the original ad-free sync price, I take all my greediness comments back !

              • @andrr_464
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                sync for reddit price (there was a pro version too) as you can see the price is reasonable. Where did you find a 6x increase?

                • @GroggyGuava
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You’re showing the price for sync ultra, he’s referring to the price for ad-free sync, which was like $2-3

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                You are comparing the old simple “Remove Ads” option to Sync Ultra features.

                The new “Remove Ads” without additional features costs 14,99 €. Which, yes, is more expensive than before, but that was to be expected. The old price would have been way too cheap for today’s pricing situation, especially since he also lost most of his userbase.

                • King
                  link
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  “today’s pricing situation” u mean 2 months ago? Also “hes lost most of his userbase”

                  selling 50$ tshirt for 500$ because there are less customers and I want even less what is this argument lmfao

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    The price was set many years ago and just never changed.

                    Also yes, less customers means less income for mostly the same amount of work. That is literally why bigger companies can offer cheaper prices. Scale.

          • @andrr_464
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            already he implemented it