• Tattorack
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    But… The developers of Palworld made a game featuring AI generated images.

    • omarfw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Companies can change their mind about stuff like this.

      • Tattorack
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes. Except they’re still selling that game.

        • omarfw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah because they spent money making it. If you spend millions of dollars making a video game, you can’t just shut it down and refund every order of it without putting your studio in serious jeopardy financially. That’s not an option for them, so the best they can do is just not rely on AI anymore. Clearly they tried it and learned that it actually sucks ass.

          • Tattorack
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a small game. They have Palworld to rake in the big bucks, so if their stance on AI use has changed, they can just remove that game.

            • omarfw
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              They’re currently being sued by Nintendo and palworld did not make anywhere near the kind of money that would let them survive a lawsuit AND a game cancellation.

              You’re making assumptions about their financials that are only ever true for enormous studios like epic games, which pocketpair is not. The gaming industry does not operate as simply as you think it does and companies don’t have the freedom to throw money away on something as simple as virtue signaling.

              It doesn’t matter if a company used AI back in 2022 when it was new and less understood; it matters what companies choose now. If you’re going to throw blind skepticism at them for not making arbitrary financial risks just to appease you, then you’re not worth appeasing anyway because you’re too cynical to be a potential customer.

              • Tattorack
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m not making assumptions about their financial situation. I’m critical of their hypocrisy. I don’t care about the excuses.

                • omarfw
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Your expectations are too high and your cynicism is clouding your judgment.

                  • Tattorack
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    My expectations are perfectly reasonable, and my cynical judgement of the industry keeps getting justified.