• Metaright
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    This is essentially incorrect; the vast majority of people here use the inferior system in everyday usage.

    • @Buffaloaf
      link
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But there are everyday examples where both are used.

      E.g. If you see someone drinking a soda and ask them how much sugar is in it they’d probably tell you a number in grams.

      Or if you have to take cough syrup the dosage is usually in milliliters.

      Or if you ask someone what size engine their car has they’ll most likely tell you in liters.

      • @BowtiesAreCool
        link
        121 year ago

        And no one brings up that the UK actually uses both and in a lot more confusing way. Fuel in Liters but efficiency in miles per gallon. Speed in miles per hour but how far you drive in Kilometers. Weight of produce in grams and people in stone.

        • @CapraObscura
          link
          31 year ago

          And even then British gallons are different from American gallons so the efficiency numbers look really frickin’ weird.

        • @DXD
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          This isn’t very accurate. Imperial is used for car and travel related measurements, metric is used elsewhere (officially). It would be nice if we switched to metric but it is OK.

          Fuel in Liters but efficiency in miles per gallon.

          Yeah, I think this is basically the only confusing and annoying imperial/metric thing we have.

          Speed in miles per hour but how far you drive in Kilometers.

          We don’t use kilometers for how far we drive. We still use miles on signage and in everyday speech, along with miles per hour. I imagine if we switched to kilometers per hour, we would start using kilometers.

          Weight of produce in grams and people in stone.

          Older generations might still use stone but it is disappearing. Even my retired dad uses kg now. Younger generations are not taught stone (for decades now), as they grow up it will disappear.

          It is a similar story to height in feet and inches. It is becoming less common, but probably slower than the switch away from stone.

    • @Zink
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      Plus, many of us are in STEM fields and appreciate/prefer the metric/SI system. However, we think in imperial units because that’s what we used in daily life in our formative years.

      I have no problem with metric units, but I do a rough mental conversion to imperial to relate to the measurement, and get a “feel” for it. This goes for temperature, distance, speed, volume, weight/mass, pressure, and essentially anything else that’s an everyday unit.

      It’s analogous to how much of the world thinks of nuclear explosions in terms of kilotons or megatons of TNT. I mean, all you have to do is multiply megatons by 4.184e+15 and you’re back to the sensible unit of Joules. :)

      • @assassin_aragorn
        link
        41 year ago

        I go back to what my professor in my first engineering class told us – a good engineer can work in any unit system.

        At the end of the day, imperial vs metric is an argument you have over some beers with friends. It’s inconsequential.

        • NoIWontPickaName
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          That’s a damn good point, the distance doesn’t change regardless of what you call it.

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            11 year ago

            Exactly. This isn’t rocket science, it’s simple math. And by knowing two unit systems, you can describe the distance in the most convenient way possible.

        • @CapraObscura
          link
          21 year ago

          Hell, I’m not an engineer and that’s something I was taught in school. In Texas. In the 80’s.

          Man, this place has devolved so horrendously…