• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Sure, but your analogy doesn’t make any sense. There is no downside to you because of this feature being in your car in a disabled state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not my analogy, but it does make sense if you even remotely think about it. The downside is that my car carries extra weight in the form of this additional hardware. Teslas are heavy enough as-is with their giant batteries, I’d rather remove any and all unnecessary weight for the sake of my tire tread life (and battery life). Also depending on exactly what the hardware is, it can be an additional point of failure that could potentially cause things that I do have access to to break. Lastly, it’s fair to assume that the price of the car would be cheaper if Tesla didn’t have to install this hardware into every car even if it will never be used, so you are likely already paying for this in “hidden” costs that are just rolled into the total price of the car before even paying to enable the features.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          The downside is that my car carries extra weight in the form of this additional hardware.

          No it doesn’t. As far as I know FSD doesn’t require additional hardware. It uses the hardware already in the car for other purposes (like lane assist, emergency braking, etc).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            FSD isn’t the only feature locked behind a paywall.

            They lock up everything from heated seats to acceleration speed.

      • El Barto
        link
        11 year ago

        That was my analogy, not of the person you replied for.

        Disabled features also add complexity to your car, which may or may not affect how much you pay for repairs.