• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Yeah, I kind of agree here. I think we should have a “playoff” system where candidates could pick a party for advertising purposes, but otherwise compete on an open playing field with all other candidates.

    Here’s how I’d like it to work:

    • ban all political ads, outside of informing when the next debate or rally will happen
    • all debates are funded with tax-payer dollars
    • for House seats, vote by party for the general election, and Reps would be elected proportionally and based on primary votes
    • Senate seats work as they currently do, except for the voting system change below
    • all votes are some kind of IRV system, e.g. ranked choice, approval, etc
    • there would be a vote after each primary debate (should have 3-5 of those), and if you don’t participate, your previous votes carry forward through the primary process; candidates are eliminated if they go under some threshold; you could straight-ticket this, but it would weight all candidates from your party equally

    This probably needs to be refined, but I think the general approach is worth discussing.

    • @doppelgangmember
      link
      31 year ago

      Nice, you got the ranked choice in there!

      “Establishment hates this one simple trick!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Lol. Ranked choice isn’t my first pick, but I think it’s an improvement. I’d prefer a bigger change than just the vote counting system though.