An EPA document shows that a new Chevron fuel ingredient has a lifetime cancer risk more than 1 million times higher than what the agency usually finds acceptable — even greater than another Chevron fuel’s sky-high risk disclosed earlier this year.

  • @tallwookie
    link
    -41 year ago

    made from discarded plastic? that’s a good use for plastic, but it seems like recycling with extra steps.

    • stopthatgirl7OP
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      A good use for plastics?

      has a lifetime cancer risk more than 1 million times higher than what the agency usually finds acceptable

      Yeah, I dunno if I’d call that a good use.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Well if we spray it on the top level staff at the EPA it could bring some benefit.

      • @tallwookie
        link
        -31 year ago

        better than dumping the plastic in the ocean I suppose.

        • scytale
          link
          51 year ago

          If I’m reading the article correctly, the ingredient is supposed to be used for boat fuel, so even the ocean isn’t safe.

          • @tallwookie
            link
            -3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            wouldnt the exhaust go into the air though? I suppose some of those exhaust particles would precipitate into the water - so maybe the algae would get cancer? can single celled organisms even get cancer?

            not sure what the issue is - if you spend your life out in the sun, you’re going to get skin cancer. not sure who’s going to get exposed to ship exhaust over their entire life. is the risk of actual cancer really that great?