The TL;DR is that the organization that controls the HDMI standard won’t allow any open source implementation of HDMI 2.1.

So the hardware is fully capable of it, but they’ll get in trouble if them officially implement it.

Instead it’s officially HDMI 2 (which maxes out at 4k @ 60Hz), but through a technique called chroma sub-sampling they’ve been able to raise that up to 4k @ 120Hz.

However there are some minor reductions in picture quality because of this, and the whole thing would be much easier if the HDMI forum would be more consumer friendly.

In the meantime, the Steam Machine also has display port as a completely issue free display option.

  • fartographer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Then the weight of the end of the cable is going to be trying to pull the connector out of the TV. DisplayPort connectors can have a latch to deal with this.

    There actually already is a USB-C locking connector standardized by the USB Implementers Forum! And 90⁰ USB-C connectors are already common, but maybe I’m misunderstanding your comment about connecting vertically.

    While I absolutely agree that connecting everything via a cable that has 2-way data communication could be a security and privacy nightmare that’ll allow advertisers unprecedented access to your eyes and ears, think about how cool it would be to have only one power cord!