• Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Except it’s more like a group of patrons at a bar talking about killing a trans person, and than the next day one of them actually does it.

    • 10A
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      What kind of absurd hyperbole is that? Nobody has called for murder. And certainly nobody has committed a murder based on a call for it.

        • 10A
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I don’t condone murder under any circumstances. But using 56 murders as an excuse to silence anyone online is a disgrace to the principle of free speech.

          • czech
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            The principle of free speech, in America, has nothing to do with forcing people to tolerate hateful rhetoric. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States.

            In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws. Freedom of speech, also called free speech, means the free and public expression of opinions without censorship, interference and restraint by the government.

            As long as the government isn’t arresting you for your opinions then nothing going on here has to do with “free speech”. Individuals and corporations silencing you online is not a “disgrace to the principle of free speech”.

            • 10A
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              You’re conflating the principle of free speech with the US 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment is predicated on the principle of free speech. The 1st Amendment is completely inapplicable here. The principle of free speech is 100% applicable here, as it is foundational to western civilization.

              • czech
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                You’re talking about a “free speech” that only exists in /r/conservative echo chambers. You are free to say what you want but you are not free from the consequences. We do not have to listen. And it’s not a “disgrace” that nobody cares to hear what you have to say.

                • 10A
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Up until a few years ago, it was widely held by people of all political persuasions to be one of the foundations of western civilization. As the far left has moved progressively further leftward, they abandoned it. The only reason you think of it as conservative is because it’s old-fashioned.

                  • czech
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    Up until a few years ago, it was widely held by people of all political persuasions

                    . You can’t just make shit up.This is only exists in your echo chambers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          He knows. That’s why he’s desperately trying to hold on to his little platform.

          Pick almost any mass shooter at random and look at their online history and you’ll find the same story over and over again; “progressively radicalised by social media”.

          They’re absolutely aware these domestic terrorists come from their midst. Find a far-right enough chat room and they openly celebrate it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Sure thing little reactionary. I guess you’ll just have to hope that if any vulnerable people find this thread, they don’t spend 5 minutes checking before throwing their lives away for your cause.