• Chetzemoka
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No. You don’t have the right to debate other people’s right to exist. Such speech is an act of violence and should be treated as such.

    I don’t want a group of people sitting around “discussing” whether or not black people are inherently inferior either. That is not speech we should accept in the public sphere

    • 10A
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you never heard “sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me”? It’s preschool 101. Speech is never an act of violence.

      Additionally, nobody is debating anyone’s right to exist.

      • Chetzemoka
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Says the person who’s never heard their own right to exist or the rights of their loved ones called into question publicly.

        You don’t have the right to “debate” other people’s equal rights.

        • 10A
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Except really, nobody’s ever debating anyone’s right to exist. That’s absurd.

          Consider this: If a mass murderer was captured and imprisoned, he could claim that the justice system opposes his right to exist. The trouble with that is he’d be completely incorrect. The justice system opposes his behavior of murder. No matter how much he believes his very existence is inextricably bound to his behavior of murder, the reality is he murders by choice, and it is that intentional action which the justice system opposes.

          • Chetzemoka
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            Did you just compare trans people living their lives without hurting anyone to murder?

            • 10A
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Sure, and I could have chosen any other action, but I chose murder because it’s not contentious to express a disapproval of it.

              • Chetzemoka
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Did it ever occur to you that it’s “contentious” to express “disapproval” of trans people existing because…there’s nothing WRONG with trans people existing?

                • 10A
                  link
                  fedilink
                  51 year ago

                  Hmm, sounds like you missed my entire point. Nobody objects to any people existing. Some people object to particular behaviors.

                  • Chetzemoka
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You don’t think trans people exist and that being trans is “a behavior” equivalent with murder.

                    I definitely understood the “point” of your bigotry perfectly well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        “Speech is never an act of violence” mfs when I use a public platform to smear them as child molesters, while simultaneously encouraging acts of vigilantism against “paedos”: 😯

      • Chetzemoka
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes I support the use of violence to defend minorities against violent oppression. And yes, I have this interesting tendency to disagree with fascists and bigots. I’m glad we understand each other.

          • Chetzemoka
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Free speech is not now, never has been, and never will be an unlimited right. Get off it.

              • Chetzemoka
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                You don’t have the right to say “I think we should literally legislate trans people out of existence because I don’t like them,” which is what we’re actually talking about here, let’s be clear