• @thorbot
    link
    29
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Where are you getting this “fact that he’s likely to win” ? He didn’t win the last one and he’s worse off this time. Also there are loads of new voters who are finally old enough to vote that are sick of all the anti-abortion anti-LGBTQ stuff the right has been pushing the last 4 years. If you regurgitate that rhetoric it’s more likely to happen.

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Aggregated polling data:

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/

      Trump is invariably within the margin of error. Add a bit of election interference, a third candidate to siphon votes, some gerry mandering, a bit of help from a partisan supreme court, …

      If you regurgitate that rhetoric it’s more likely to happen.

      I have a related degree.

      An important way republicans will try to win the election for Trump, is to target democratic voters with propaganda which suggests that Biden is certain to win or that he’s more right wing than he actually is, thereby lowering democratic turnout.

      They know they won’t convince young voters to vote conservative, they know they won’t win majority support, so they’ll try to convince progressive to not bother voting at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The polls are only showing that because he hasn’t clinched the nomination yet so the huge number of people who dislike both candidates don’t feel like they have to make a decision yet. Once that happens, I think we’ll see a big drop in his numbers. I could be wrong, but I’m usually not, at least when it comes to politics.

        • Hyperreality
          link
          fedilink
          111 year ago

          the huge number of people who dislike both candidates don’t feel like they have to make a decision yet.

          If you look at actual polls, you’ll find the number of undecided voters is surprisingly low.

          Eg. https://emersoncollegepolling.com/michigan-2024-trump-and-biden-on-course-for-tight-rematch/

          An august 1-2 poll of Michigan voters, 44% Trump, 44% biden, 8% other, just 5% undecided. It’s unlikely they’ll all split Biden, and even they disproportionately did, a Trump win would still be well within the margin of error.

          Biden isn’t an unknown quantity. Trump isn’t an unknown quantity. Voters know what they stand for by now, they know what they’ll be like as president. And yet it’s still close.

          Let’s put it this way, I admire your optimism if you assume Biden will win easily.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            We will know soon enough. I was right when I said that there wouldn’t be a “red wave” during the midterms, in spite of what the polls said, and I’m positive that I am right when I say that the polls aren’t giving us a clear picture of what to expect of a third Trump presidential campaign.

            Again, what I think we’re seeing in the polls reflects a dislike for both candidates, but not a dislike that’s evenly distributed or felt with the same degree of vehemence.

            Teasing out that difference is difficult using traditional polling methods, but it becomes obvious when one looks at how many Americans find Trump objectively abhorrent.

            My prediction is that Biden defeats Trump handily, not in a landslide, but convincingly enough to permanently show Trump the door.

            I may be wrong. We will see.

            • Hyperreality
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was right when I said that there wouldn’t be a “red wave” during the midterms, in spite of what the polls said

              The polls didn’t say there would be a red wave. Aggregated polling suggested there was a 42% chance the democrats won at least the house.

              https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2022-election-forecast/

              Same thing happened in 2016, when IRC polling suggested Trump had something like a 1/3 chance of winning, but media painted a Clinton win being a certainty.

              Be more wary of how the media reports on polling.

      • @reallynotnick
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There won’t be any gerrymandering for President unless they are able to change State boarders. Voter suppression in targeted areas however is possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Gerrymandering doesn’t affect presidential elections. Only the lower house of Congress and the state legislative branch.

    • @InternetUser2012
      link
      41 year ago

      That’s their plan. Anyone posting bullshit like that is someone I’ll be immediately suspicious of. Trump will lose again and maybe it’ll be blow that sends his racist cult back under the rocks they came from. Everyday boomers are dropping to old age and younger people are hitting voting age. The last election was their last chance and they knew it, that’s why they all knew what he was trying to do and they went with it. Soon we can start repairing the damage they’ve done and start working ourselves back out of the 60’s and look to the future.

      • @thorbot
        link
        31 year ago

        I agree but we have to get and actually vote!

    • TheProtagonist
      link
      21 year ago

      And also Q-Anon isn’t a thing anymore, which was a base of his firmest believers, fighting against Hillary and others, who were said to be eating children in a Washington Pizzeria. But I really ask myself what on earth could make people hold on to this criminal and vote for him…

      • @thorbot
        link
        21 year ago

        I’m sorry to say it but Q-Anon is absolutely still a thing. They aren’t as loud but I know at least 1 person in my town who rants about Q-Anon type shit.