U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, a Trump appointee, said in the 2-1 decision that the state’s law could not stand under the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark gun rights ruling.
I’m a bit confused. Does this mean that each and every state that does not allow open carry is unconstitutional? I also do not see how “there are requirements to carrying a firearm” equates to “you cannot carry a firearm.”
I’m a bit confused. Does this mean that each and every state that does not allow open carry is unconstitutional? I also do not see how “there are requirements to carrying a firearm” equates to “you cannot carry a firearm.”
I think they glazed over the well regulated militia part intentionally.