• @Kraivo
    link
    -361 year ago

    I am surprised by amount of negativity on this sub. Like it is almost impossible to have a decent conversation. People just go nuts about operation which is about hygiene. Good luck, guys. I just don’t see myself here

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      Yeah, why would so many people have negative views on chopping off part of a baby’s body?

      Weird.

    • @4lan
      link
      161 year ago

      I’m cut, and like it that way. But your position is flawed.

      If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right? It’s not about hygiene, that’s dogma. It’s wild that it’s based in religion originally because if ‘god’ made you in his image it’s pretty fucked up to immediately alter a baby to be different.

      It’s funny when people assign the term ‘negative’ to anything they don’t want to hear about.
      You don’t have to read anything you don’t want to. Move on if you don’t have anything to contribute

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        So I actually have no dog in this fight but I read this

        If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right?

        Counterpoint: that was before “pants.”

        Good question though, most of the animal world has retractable peni, why’d we lose that ability? Now I’m curious.

        Also, shouldn’t the religious oppose it because it is fucking with “God’s creation?” Frankly them supporting it seems like flawed logic to me.

        • jerry
          link
          51 year ago

          No, mutations are mutations, they have no purpose, some are beneficial and are prioritized by evolution.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            So you’re saying we lost retractable penises “just because?”

            Cause I looked into it, and it seems that since we walk upright there’s less of a chance at scraping it on the ground, so we can trade dicksheaths for extra room in our hips which would likely help moving around on two legs, which makes sense.

            • jerry
              link
              21 year ago

              I’m not saying that

        • @SuddenDownpour
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Let’s note here that evolution doesn’t care for “functions” or “utility” as much as it cares for “reasons”. We won’t be the first nor the last animal to get screwed in a shitty trade-off that natural selection deemed necessary. Humans are notorious for being born far more defenseless than most other mammals - evolution forced it upon us because otherwise our larger heads would kill far too many mothers.

        • @legion02
          link
          21 year ago

          I hadn’t even thought about pants as being a compounding factor. It seems unlikely that cavemen had better cleanliness education than we do but smegma build up would be a problem even for them… Unless underwear/pants are what cause it to build up.

      • jerry
        link
        11 year ago

        It was originally the Jewish convent with God. Idk why I was sliced, but it became common in the U.S.

        • @4lan
          link
          11 year ago

          It’s an oddly barbaric tradition to keep around for so long without a religious rationalization. Most circumcised Americans are not Jewish

    • Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      If you’re an absolute pig that doesn’t wash his penis, yeah it’s better for hygiene. I have a better solution than chopping of your peepee, though: how about you fucking wash it?

    • @pozbo
      link
      11 year ago

      You aren’t required to comment, but thanks for letting us know how unhappy you are here.

      Guys, its working

    • jerry
      link
      -51 year ago

      Atheists are angry a lot, especially young ones in the us.

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        With how much religion has damaged the world, can you really blame them?

        • jerry
          link
          11 year ago

          Yes and no, I was an angry atheist for a long time, now I’m a live and let live agnostic.