• @woelkchen
    link
    English
    59 months ago

    The event itself must have a lot carbon footprint.

    Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 months ago

      Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.

      • @woelkchen
        link
        English
        -39 months ago

        Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.

        I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition?

        Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.