• @Captain_Nipples
    link
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Depends on the job. We have labor positions that pay $18, but demand a little bit of physical labor. It’s hard to fill those positions.

    10 years ago, people would line up for that job for less than $10/hr and the work was much, much harder. Something has definitely changed

    When I started with the company in 09, people were coming in during outages and trying to outperform each other so they’d be hired on full-time. But the economy was ass back then and it was hard to find a full-time job at my age

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      161 year ago

      Expenses have changed.

      My apartment I paid $700/month for in 2011 is now over $2000/month.

      When ex to expenses outpace wages more than 2:1, eventually it catches up and people can’t afford to live where the work is.

      • @Captain_Nipples
        link
        61 year ago

        Makes sense. Same in my area. I wonder if this isn’t all going to blow up and cause another recession soon. Seems like this shit can’t be like this for long.

    • cheesepotatoes
      link
      81 year ago

      Something has definitely changed

      Ya, the cost of living. If you’re offering a wage below the poverty line AND the labour is back breaking, you can’t possibly expect positive results.

      • @Captain_Nipples
        link
        21 year ago

        Eh, it’s not backbreaking… But I see what you’re saying. What do all the 20 y/o non college educated kids do now? I know not all of them are in a trade school.

        • cheesepotatoes
          link
          41 year ago

          Ya, I get what you’re saying too. I don’t know what they’re doing, I’m not particularly dialed in with that demographic. I do know that logically, if the wage being offered can’t even cover rent then there really isn’t a point to doing it. Probably more efficient to do gig economy work, or something under the table, or crime to be honest.