• GarboDog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It should be illegal, thank goodness it’s finally being considered

    • Bloomcole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Do you think Kid Starver will get permission from his boss Santanyahoo?

    • UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It shouldn’t be any more illegal than any harmless cosmetic procedure.

      The last thing you want is unsupervised and unsanitary procedures done by a religious zealot.

      Outlawing circumcision sends you down the same road as outlawing ear piercings or abortions or transgender surgery. You’re guaranteed to do more harm than good.

      • michaelmrose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Can you legally get any other cosmetic surgery on a less than 1 yr old?

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It should not be legal. It is a cosmetic surgery forced upon children.

        • UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Cosmetic surgery should not be banned on children. What is up with the UK and wanting to criminalize everything?

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is not a “harmless cosmetic procedure.” It’s more akin to ritual scarification or removing something like a lip, eyelid, or nose. It destroys nerve endings, causing a permanent loss of sensitivity, and the head of the penis is a mucus membrane that the foreskin is meant to keep moist and protect from damage. Most people had it done before they were old enough to be aware of the difference, but those who had it done later in life often report things like a reduction in the ability to feel sexual pleasure.

        Medically necessary circumcision or somebody choosing to have it done is one thing, forcing an amputation onto a baby is entirely different. It’s like forcing a trans person to go through the wrong puberty: unwanted and permanent physical changes that can take years of therapy and medical procedures to heal from.

        • mean_bean279
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s more reasons to have it done. It’s ultimately something that parents should only consider if they have a history of urinary tract issues since often times foreskin can cause issues like UTIs to be more frequent.

          Also, as a male with a circumcised dick I haven’t needed therapy for it. So comparing it to a trans person is kind of rude to the trans community. It’s also straight up not a big deal. My parents made decisions they felt were right at the time. Life goes on. I’m doing the same with my child and the hope is that I make more good decisions than bad.

        • UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          removing something like a lip, eyelid, or nose

          That’s absurd and you should know better. Tell someone who had their nose removed that “it’s just like circumcision” and see how they respond.

      • Bloomcole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        BS argument.
        And the woman should have their vagina mutilated too for the same then right?
        Let’s clear the roads between 8-10 PM so we can have some car racing and donuts.
        And take your now legal guns and drugs too, we can have a fun evening of supervised shooting and meth!

      • Potatar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The topic is child (cannot consent, hell in some cases cannot talk yet because too young) circumcision, you are talking about puberty+(can semi-consent: can decide who to live with in family seperation for example) issues?

        I agree about the black market but perfect is the enemy of good?

        Also harmless? WTF

        • mean_bean279
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s lots of things that parents do to their kids without their consent. I’d argue it’s worse to share their face on social media than to circumcise due to the true dangers of predators usage of technology. That doesn’t mean I think parents should be considered abusive if they do. That said, this is in the UK so I don’t have a horse in that race.

          • michaelmrose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This is your fantasy. Sharing their face on social media is less dangerous than biking to a friend’s house

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If the parents were made aware that its abusive and do it anyways then yes its abuse. Some people will question things naturally and thats fine, others will need information brought to them directly and thats also fine.

            We should expect parents to put effort into making the best decisions they can with the information they have available.

        • UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          cannot consent, hell in some cases cannot talk yet because too young

          Again, people get their baby’s ears pierced all the time. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg on parent approved medical procedures. If circumcision upsets you, how do you feel about ear tubes, tonsillectomies, and cleft pallet repair?

          I agree about the black market but perfect is the enemy of good?

          I would say the cost of criminalization far outweighs the benefit.

          • michaelmrose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The cost of criminalizing it is virtually nobody does it because they don’t want to lose their license or go to jail this seems pretty cheap

            • UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Rabbis will continue to perform the surgery in secret, in the same way piercings and abortions and transgender surgery continues in the face of criminalization.

          • drunkpostdisaster
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            People should not be piercing their baby’s ears too. Neat that you used the same argument Republicans use use against gay marriage. We don’t see your kind here to often.

            • UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              People should not be piercing their baby’s ears too.

              People shouldn’t be arrested for piercing a babies ears either.

              Having the police kick down your door and drag you to a cell over this shit is not an improved outcome

              • michaelmrose
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                How are people going to be dragged to a cell for getting a procedure done that no Dr will do again?

                • UnderpantsWeevil
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  That’s the whole problem. You won’t have doctors doing it. You’ll have rabbis doing it.

              • wondrous_strange
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                You are truly sick with how much it’s important for you to chop off babies dicks. You are defending a barbaric stupid meaningless ritual with such ridiculous arguments, why?

                Having children ears pierced should also be criminal, but at least with ear piercing it doesn’t do any damage and can be removed later, as opposed to having their genitals mutallated by a religious nutjob for nothing.

                Fact is, this would die out if not forced on helpless babies at 8 days old because no sane person would want to inflict this on their body unless theres a very good medical reason (which there is none for most of people).

                All the examples you gave stem out from the person’s own decision or due to medical necessity.

                I would argue that people who support this fucked up ritual should also be criminalized.

                • UnderpantsWeevil
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  how much it’s important for you to chop off babies dicks.

                  It’s sick to arrest people. The entire criminal justice system in the UK is a nightmare of abuse and neglect.

                  Anyone who would advocate finding new reasons to expose more people to it is deranged. Anything you think you’re protecting people from pales in comparison to expanding the scope of your miserable fascist police state